Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Azorius Omniscience | waffelsking | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Azorius Omniscience | evhuner | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Dimir Midrange | thetunnelingcat | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Azorius Omniscience | callad0 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Azorius Omniscience | flaviojr | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Tempo , Bant Omniscience , Dimir Control , Dimir Flash , Dimir Midrange , Esper Oculus , Izzet Spellslingers , Jeskai Oculus
Ephara's Dispersal ranks #203 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 60%).
Blue average: 58.7%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Ephara's Dispersal is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 14.40 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.2%. Ephara's Dispersal has a win rate of 76.8%, making it 11.1% better than other 3-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Roiling Dragonstorm | Enchantment | 5 | 86.6% | 2 |
Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 6 | 83.2% | 2 |
Cut Down | Instant | 5 | 80.4% | 2 |
Jeskai Revelation | Instant | 14 | 73.8% | 3 |
Up the Beanstalk | Enchantment | 10 | 64.4% | 4 |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 6 | 61.9% | 2 |
Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 10 | 57.3% | 4 |
Bushwhack | Sorcery | 10 | 57.3% | 4 |
Haunt the Network | Sorcery | 91 | 56.6% | 18 |
Overlord of the Mistmoors | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 10 | 56.2% | 1 |
Cards that perform better with Ephara's Dispersal than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Roiling Dragonstorm | Enchantment | 2 | 5 | 84.8% | 74.5% | +10.2% |
Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 6 | 6 | 82.7% | 76.2% | +6.5% |
This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 13 | 78.6% | 73.3% | +5.3% |
Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 30 | 76.5% | 72.4% | +4.1% |
Defabricate | Instant | 2 | 9 | 84.4% | 80.7% | +3.7% |
Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 28 | 76.6% | 73.4% | +3.2% |
Negate | Instant | 2 | 32 | 76.8% | 74.2% | +2.6% |
Riptide Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 5 | 23 | 78.1% | 75.9% | +2.2% |
Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 30 | 76.4% | 74.3% | +2.1% |
Season of Weaving | Sorcery | 6 | 7 | 76.4% | 75.6% | +0.8% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Azorius Omniscience | 330 | 100.0% | 49.6% |
Simic Terror | 30 | 9.8% | 50.2% |
Azorius Tempo | 20 | 5.0% | 31.4% |
Sultai Emergence | 5 | 13.9% | 0.0% |
Unknown Archetype | 4 | 1.3% | 50.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.